My panel for
bittercon.
Big long series are very popular (readers like them because they know what to expect, publishers like them because they know how well they'll sell, authors like them because publishers like them). But sometimes an author will lose control of the story and just start flailing around at random. What are the signs this has happened?
My list:
I'm not just referring to Robert Jordan here; I suspect GRRM is already showing some of these, and this post was prompted by seeing that last point in the latest mystery by Carole Nelson Douglas.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Big long series are very popular (readers like them because they know what to expect, publishers like them because they know how well they'll sell, authors like them because publishers like them). But sometimes an author will lose control of the story and just start flailing around at random. What are the signs this has happened?
My list:
- Individual volumes end at arbitrary points and lack their own story arc
- Focus shifts from the original main characters to minor characters introduced partway into the series
- New mysteries added without old ones being solved
- Page counts increase while the number of events decrease
- Cliffhangers aren't resolved in the next book
I'm not just referring to Robert Jordan here; I suspect GRRM is already showing some of these, and this post was prompted by seeing that last point in the latest mystery by Carole Nelson Douglas.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
One thing I admire about J K Rowling is that she had the seven book sequence apparently prepared right from the word go and knew exactly where she was going, and to some extent it shows. On the other hand, I got the feeling that book 5 was a certain amount of wheel spinning; she didn't really need it to advance the plot arc(s) and that is why it's the weakest in the sequence imho.
(no subject)
(no subject)
The number of planned books starts increasing . . . and keeps increasing.
The mysteries seem to be mysterious for the sake of puzzling the fans, not for any story sense.
For your second-to-last one, I'd add that the number of _significant_ events decrease. It's possible to spend half a book on a single day, if it's a really important day.
(no subject)
Another key warning sign is when you start seeing re-runs of character emotional arcs. C.f., oh, I dunno, a gazillion comic books, but also Series 5 of Babylon 5, wherein the writer/producer had had to advance a bunch of stuff to finish the major story arcs in Series 4 (because everybody thought the show was over), and then suddenly found themselves with the fifth year they'd wanted all along. This left two major characters (G'Kar and Londo Mollari) without nearly as much to do as they'd have otherwise had, so their interaction arc from the second half of Series 4 kind of got rerun in more detail in Series 5. It really detracted from that year. I rather suspect that Series 5 showed it the way it had been originally planned, but because we'd seen them cover this ground already, it just didn't work right.
(no subject)
"Nothing happens, very slowly and with many details and much angst" is not my favorite thing.